[Sep-2026] PSM-II Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2026 Professional Scrum Master level II (PSM II) [Q58-Q72]

Rate this post

[Sep-2026] PSM-II Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2026 Professional Scrum Master level II (PSM II)

Free PSM-II Exam Dumps to Pass Exam Easily

Scrum PSM-II exam consists of 30 multiple-choice questions, and the candidate has 90 minutes to complete the exam. The passing score for the PSM-II exam is 85%, which means that the candidate must answer at least 25 questions correctly to pass the exam. PSM-II exam is an online proctored exam, which means that the candidate can take the exam from the comfort of their own home or office.

The PSM-II certification exam is intended for Scrum Masters who have at least one year of experience working with Scrum in a professional environment and who have already obtained the PSM-I certification. It is also recommended that candidates have experience working with teams on complex projects and have a deep understanding of agile principles and methodologies.

Q58. Technical Debt can lead to false assumptions about the current state of the system and the Increment reviewed at the end of the Sprint.

True

False

Q59. You are the Scrum Master for four teams working from the same Product Backlog. Several of the Developers come to you complaining that work identified for the upcoming two Sprints will require full time commitment from Phil, an external specialist. As the Scrum Master what should you do to solve this upcoming problem?
(choose the best answer)

Prepare the Sprint Backlogs each day tor the teams so Phil can spend some time in each team.

Allocate Phil to one team per Sprint, so that over tour Sprints every team will have had the support It requires.

As needed, consult with the Developers on now they want to manage this problem and help them implement their preferred solution.

Ask Phil tor a plan to hire and train additional people in nis domain, and in the meantime work with the Product Owner and Developers to re-prioritize the work so that tasks not depending on Phil can be done first.

Explanation
As the Scrum Master, your role is to serve the Scrum Team by helping them to work effectively and deliver value. You are not responsible for managing the work or assigning tasks to the Developers. You should respect the self-organization and autonomy of the Developers, and support them in finding their own solutions to the problem. You should also facilitate collaboration and communication among the Developers and with other stakeholders, such as Phil and the Product Owner.
Some reasons why the other options are not correct are:
A: Preparing the Sprint Backlogs each day for the teams so Phil can spend some time in each team. This option is not correct because it violates the Scrum framework and the Scrum Master role. The Sprint Backlog is owned and managed by the Developers, not by the Scrum Master. The Scrum Master should not interfere with or dictate how the Developers plan and execute their work. The Scrum Master should also not impose a solution that may not be optimal or feasible for the teams or for Phil.
B: Allocate Phil to one team per Sprint, so that over four Sprints every team will have had the support it requires. This option is not correct because it violates the Scrum framework and the Scrum Master role.
The Scrum Master should not allocate resources or assign tasks to the teams or to Phil. The Scrum Master should also not impose a solution that may not be aligned with the Product Owner’s priorities or the teams’ needs.
D: Ask Phil for a plan to hire and train additional people in his domain, and in the meantime work with the Product Owner and Developers to re-prioritize the work so that tasks not depending on Phil can be done first. This option is not correct because it violates the Scrum framework and the Scrum Master role. The Scrum Master should not ask Phil to do something that may be beyond his authority or responsibility. The Scrum Master should also not work with the Product Owner and Developers to re-prioritize the work, as this is the Product Owner’s accountability. The Scrum Master should respect the Product Owner’s decisions on what is valuable and what is not, and support the Developers in delivering that value.
References:
What is a Scrum Master? | Scrum.org
What is a Sprint Backlog? | Scrum.org
Who is responsible for dependency management? | Scrum.org
[Managing Dependencies in Scrum – Scrum Alliance]

Q60. At the fifth Sprint Retrospective, the Product Owner mentions that he is surprised about the amount of technical debt that has built up in the system and that the product is not able to support an adequate number of users. Peter, the Product Owner, is upset that the product will need several more Sprints to address the scalability issues in order to meet his expectations.
What factors may have led to this?

The Scrum Team has not used the past Sprint Retrospectives effectively to inspect and adapt.

The Development Team has not been paying enough attention to technical quality.

The Development Team and the Product Owner are not having conversations around technical debt.

The Scrum Master has not ensured that the Scrum Team is transparent.

All of the above.

None of the above.

Q61. Steven is a Scrum Master for three different teams building a single product from the same Product Backlog.
Development Team members from each team have approached Steven complaining that their teams need Nicole, an external specialist, to commit full time for their next Sprint.
Which three acceptable solutions would Steven consider? (Choose three.)

For Sprints that require Nicole’s expertise for more than one team, combine the teams into one and separate when they no longer need to share her services.

Investigate whether applying additional techniques or frameworks for scaling Scrum would be appropriate for this product team in the future, since you have multiple Scrum Teams working on the same product, with dependencies between the teams.

People from the Development Teams with an interest in Nicole’s domain could volunteer to take on this work in their respective teams.

Ask Nicole for a plan to hire and train additional people in her domain, and in the meantime work with the Product Owner and Development Teams to re-prioritize the work so that tasks not depending on Nicole can be done first.

Have the Development Team re-order the Product Backlog so Nicole can serve one team full-time in a Sprint.

Create a team with Nicole and people from the teams to temporarily work in Nicole’s domain to serve the existing teams.

Q62. You are the Scrum Master of a Scrum Team that has one Developer who disagrees with team decisions. Their disagreements are becoming disruptive and slowing progress. The Developer often returns to earlier team decisions and re-opens the issue.
What are two ways to go about this problem?
(choose the best two answers)

You organize an offsite team building activity to establish a foundation of trust. You observe whether the problem persists after the offsite activity.

You take the Developer aside to express your concern over their disagreements and tell them to act as a team player and to comply with the team’s decision.

At the Sprint Retrospective you observe whether the topic is raised. If it does not happen, you check on how comfortable everybody is with the way team decisions are made.

You go to the Human Resources department and ask them to have a
conversation with the Developer based on the issues the team has raised.

To every team member expressing this concern you suggest raising this with the full team. You offer to help initiate the conversation but not to resolve the concern yourself.

Q63. During the implementation of an item in the Sprint Backlog, a conflict arises between team members about what work is needed to make the item ‘done’. Some say it is a part of the Definition of Done and others say it isn’t. Steven, the Scrum Master, observes a debate forming and members beginning to take sides.
What is the best action for Steven to take?

Bring the Development Team members together and interpret the Definition of Done for them so that there are no future conflicts on interpretation.

Immediately end the discussion before it becomes worse. Make the decision on what work is needed to make the item ‘done’ and teach the team about the importance of avoiding conflicts.

Facilitate a session with all members on the Scrum Team to help them resolve the conflict, refine the Definition of Done, and become effective again. Tell the team that conflicts are a natural occurrence and coach them on the value of resolving conflicts.

Bring the Product Owner to the discussion and have him/her decide the work needed to make the item ‘done.’ It is the Product Owner’s responsibility to manage the Development Team members.

Q64. Steven, a Scrum Master, has been hired by an organization that is new to Scrum. He has been invited to meet the IT and product management team to kick-off the project. During the meeting the Product Owner asks how many Sprints will be needed to address the entire architecture and infrastructure before working on the features for the new product.
What are the two best responses for Steven to explain how such work is handled in Scrum?
(Choose two.)

You explain that product management should not worry about technical solutions. You inform them that the developers will work with the IT department when needed and keep the Product Owner updated on additional time required for each Sprint. The additional effort will be added to the top of the Sprint Backlog before Sprint Planning.

You explain that it is more effective when architecture and infrastructure emerge alongside the development of business functionality. The additional advantage is that business value is created more quickly and earlier.

You confirm that architecture and infrastructure is needed before starting on business functionality but the estimated budget will be difficult to estimate. You suggest that the first Sprint will be dedicated towards building the technical foundation in order to get an accurate estimation for any additional budget and time required.

You coach the Product Owner and Development Team to add this work to Product Backlog to ensure transparency, have the Development Team estimate the work and do this in early Sprints while also creating some business functionality in the early Sprints.

Q65. In Scrum, how would budgeting and financial forecasting be performed? (Choose two.)

Frequently inspect the outcomes of the delivered Sprint Increments to understand how much value is being produced per investment spent.

A single release may be funded with several Sprints where every Sprint is producing shippable increments.

Budgeting is not necessary as the only funding necessary is the operational costs of the Scrum Teams.

Fixed budgets are not allowed in Scrum.

Q66. According to the Scrum Guide, where should the Daily Scrum be held?

Wherever the Development Team decides is most suitable.

In a room where management can attend.

In the same location where the Development Team is seated.

In front of the Scrum board.

Wherever the Scrum Master decides is best.

Q67. Paul is a Product Owner for multiple products. Each product is allocated a dedicated Scrum Team and a set budget. Based on the average velocity of a previous product release, Paul had estimated a new product to take 9 Sprints to complete. The average velocity of the previous product release was 50 completed units of work per Sprint. Over the first 3 Sprints, the Development Team reported an average velocity of 40 completed units per Sprint, while not fully completing the required integration tests. The Development Team estimates that integration testing would require additional effort to make the increments shippable. The Development Team is unsure if the required velocity is achievable.
What is the most effective way to recover?

In the next Sprints, the Development Team strives to make the selected work as close to `done’ as possible and at the minimum 90% completed. Any undone work is divided into new Product Backlog Items that will be deferred to the last Sprint in order to maintain stable velocity.

The Development Team informs Paul that the progress he has perceived to date is not correct.
The Increment is not releasable. They give Paul their estimate of the effort it would take to get the previous work `done’, and suggest doing that work first before proceeding with new features. The team also re- estimates the effort to make the remaining Product Backlog items `done’, including all integration effort.
In the end, it is Paul’s call to continue the project or to cancel.

The Scrum Master will manage the Sprint Backlog and assign work to the Development Team members to ensure maximum utilization of each member. He/she will keep track of unused resources so that it does not impact the budget. Unused budget can be allocated for additional Sprints if needed.

The Scrum Master sets the open work aside to be performed in one or more release Sprints.They remind Paul to find funding for enough Release Sprints in which this remaining work can be done. Up to one release Sprint per three development Sprints may be required. It is Paul’s role to inform users and stakeholders of the impact on the release date.

Q68. Currently, your engineering department is organized in siloed teams that specialize by function (for example, design, front-end, back-end, database, and testing).
What would you consider when moving away from component teams towards feature teams?

You cannot begin Scrum without have feature teams. It is easier to measure and compare performance between feature teams. Feature teams should have an equal number of team members.

Members within feature teams require compatible personalities. Feature teams should have a mix of junior and senior members. Tasks are completed more quickly than component teams.

Moving from component teams to feature teams could reduce, productivity in the initial stages. Feature teams have less communication complexity. Getting the support from the business side makes the transition easier.

Q69. At the ninth Sprint Retrospective, the Product Owner is very disappointed and angry. She has determined that the technical debt has increased, and the product is not meeting her expectations. The product will need a few more Sprints to meet the scalability requirements.
Which of the following could be true? Select the best response.
(choose the best answer)

The Scrum Team has not used the past Sprint Retrospectives effectively to inspect and adapt.

The Developers have not been paying enough attention to quality.

The Scrum Team is not having conversations around technical debt.

The Scrum Master has not ensured that the Scrum Team is being transparent.

All of the above.

None of the above.

Explanation
The situation described in the question indicates that there are multiple problems in the Scrum Team that have led to the increase of technical debt and the dissatisfaction of the Product Owner. These problems include:
The Scrum Team has not used the past Sprint Retrospectives effectively to inspect and adapt. The Sprint Retrospective is an opportunity for the Scrum Team to reflect on their performance and identify improvements for the next Sprint. If the Scrum Team has not been using this event properly, they may have missed some issues or opportunities that could have improved their quality and value delivery.
The Developers have not been paying enough attention to quality. The Developers are accountable for creating a potentially releasable product increment that meets the Definition of Done and the Sprint Goal. If the Developers have not been focusing on quality, they may have introduced defects, errors, or inefficiencies that compromise the functionality and usability of the product.
The Scrum Team is not having conversations around technical debt. Technical debt is the accumulation of work that needs to be done to ensure that a product is maintainable and extensible in the future. If the Scrum Team is not discussing and managing technical debt, they may be neglecting some important aspects of the product architecture, design, or code that could affect its scalability, performance, or security.
The Scrum Master has not ensured that the Scrum Team is being transparent. The Scrum Master is responsible for establishing an environment where transparency, inspection, and adaptation can occur. If the Scrum Master has not ensured that the Scrum Team is being transparent, they may have allowed some hidden problems or assumptions to persist that could affect the quality and value of the product.
References:
Scrum Guide 2020, page 13: “The purpose of the Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness.” Scrum Guide 2020, page 10: “The Developers are the people in the Scrum Team that are committed to creating any aspect of a usable Increment each Sprint.” Professional Scrum Master II Course, page 12: “Technical debt is a metaphor for expressing how doing things in a suboptimal way can accumulate over time and make it harder to change or improve a product in the future.” Scrum Guide 2020, page 6: “The Scrum Master is accountable for establishing Scrum as defined in the Scrum Guide. They do this by helping everyone understand Scrum theory and practice, both within the Scrum Team and the organization.”

Q70. During Sprint Planning, the Definition of Done will help the Development Team forecast the amount of work, selected from the Product Backlog, deemed feasible to make ‘done’ by the end of the Sprint.
Which two items best describes what ‘done’ means? (Choose two.)

All the work needed to prepare the Increment for User Acceptance Testing.

All the work needed to prepare the Increment for Integration Testing.

Having an Increment of working software that is potentially releasable to the end users.

All the work performed as defined in the Definition of Done.

All the work completed within the current skills and expertise in the Development Team.

Q71. At the seventh Sprint Review, the stakeholders seem disappointed and angry. When asked about it, they say the product being built will not meet their needs and will cost more than they anticipated spending. What factors may have led to this?
(choose the best three answers)

The stakeholders have not been using the Sprint Reviews to actively engage, and inspect and evaluate progress.

The stakeholders were not allowed to enter the development area, or be present at the Daily Scrum.

The Project Management Office (PMO) and its project managers have not been adequately engaged, causing the project plan to become inaccurate.

The Scrum Master has not ensured transparency.

The Product Owner has not been interacting frequently with the stakeholders and kept them aware of the progress of the project.

Changes to the project plan were not adequately documented and shared. The change request procedure was not diligently followed.

Explanation
A) The stakeholders have not been using the Sprint Reviews to actively engage, and inspect and evaluate progress. This is a possible factor that may have led to the disappointment and anger of the stakeholders. The Sprint Review is an event where the Scrum Team and the stakeholders collaborate to inspect the product Increment and adapt the Product Backlog based on feedback and new insights. If the stakeholders do not participate actively in the Sprint Review, they may miss the opportunity to provide input, voice their concerns, and influence the direction of the product development.
D) The Scrum Master has not ensured transparency. This is another possible factor that may have led to the disappointment and anger of the stakeholders. The Scrum Master is accountable for establishing and promoting transparency among the Scrum Team and the stakeholders, by ensuring that everyone has a clear and common understanding of the product vision, the Product Goal, the Product Backlog, the Sprint Goal, the Sprint Backlog, and the Definition of Done. Without transparency, there may be misalignment, confusion, or unrealistic expectations among the stakeholders regarding the product being built.
E) The Product Owner has not been interacting frequently with the stakeholders and kept them aware of the progress of the project. This is also a possible factor that may have led to the disappointment and anger of the stakeholders. The Product Owner is responsible for engaging with the stakeholders regularly and communicating the value, scope, and status of the product development. The Product Owner should also seek feedback from the stakeholders and incorporate it into the Product Backlog refinement and ordering. If the Product Owner does not interact frequently with the stakeholders, they may feel disconnected, ignored, or dissatisfied with the product being built.
References:
The Scrum Guide, section 2.3 (The Scrum Team), page 7
The Scrum Guide, section 3.6 (The Sprint Review), page 11
The Scrum Guide, section 4.1 (The Product Backlog), page 11
The Scrum Master Learning Path, module 2 (The Scrum Framework), lesson 5 (The Sprint Review) and lesson 6 (The Sprint Retrospective)

Q72. A Scrum Master is not only a servant-leader to the Scrum Team and organization, it’s also considered a management position.
Which three activities describe what a Scrum Master manages as reflected by the Scrum Guide?
(Choose three.)

Reporting on the performance of the Sprint.

The way Scrum is understood and enacted within the organization.

Managing the capacity and utilization of each Development Team member.

Managing the process in which Scrum is applied.

Managing the Product Backlog items and work in the Sprint Backlog.

Removing organizational impediments that limits the team’s progress and productivity.